23 September 2014
For Immediate Release
Pema Dolma, Students for a Free Tibet, German/English: +41 764331614
Iona Liddell, Tibet Justice Center, English: + 44 7712 570736
Mandie McKeown, International Tibet Network, English: +44 7748 158 618
NEW HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION PLAN OUTLINES VISION FOR
POSITIVE CHANGE FOR TIBET
Governments and United Nations bodies urged to use Tibet as litmus test for positive human rights progress across China
Geneva – Tibet advocates and UN experts have today presented a new Human Rights Action Plan for Tibet (HRAP-T) during the United Nations Human Rights Council session in Geneva . The HRAP-T has been developed by Tibet Advocacy Coalition  for governments and international human rights mechanisms to use as a means to monitor how China implements its human rights commitments in Tibet.
Some of the most visible human rights offences committed by China occur in Tibet , a country occupied by China for over six decades. China has enacted a series of region-specific measures in Tibet. As a result, the Tibetan people’s human rights have been violated, in spite of the efforts of governments and civil society organisations to focus attention on the problem. Over the past five years, the situation has worsened and looks set to continue unless effectively checked.
In the past 12 months there have been two major UN Reviews  of China; both of which highlighted a number of Tibet-specific recommendations to improve the situation in Tibet.
“It is vital that China is held accountable to its international obligations and human rights commitments, and that there is progress in the critical situation in Tibet,” said Iona Liddell, Tibet Justice Center. “In order to support positive change happening on the ground, UN member states and the international community must step up their engagement on Tibet. This Human Rights Action Plan is our contribution to help make that happen.”
During China’s 2nd cycle Universal Periodic Review in 2013/14, a number of UN states mentioned Tibet, making it impossible for China to hide the reality of appalling human rights abuses on the ground. In its immediate response to the Review, China showed that it is not willing to take responsibility for the deterioration in Tibet; all the more reason for why a robust monitoring programme is required.
“China’s acceptance of human rights recommendations does not in itself constitute progress for the human rights situation for Tibetans in Tibet,” said Mandie McKeown, International Tibet Network. “We need to see clear and precise changes to the human rights situation that directly relate to Tibet, and we have developed this Human Rights Action Plan for Tibet in order to help governments in their efforts to monitor the crisis situation in which over 130 Tibetans have set themselves on fire  calling for change in Tibet.”
“Tibet really is a litmus test for positive human rights changes in China,” said Pema Dolma, Students for a Free Tibet. “Rather than expecting Tibet to improve from the trickle-down effect of policy changes in Han China, evidence of positive human rights changes in Tibet would be a welcome indicator of wider human rights changes across China more generally.”
“We are looking ahead to monitoring China’s policy implementation. The Human Rights Action Plan for Tibet provides a tool with which to measure successful implementation in Tibet,” added Pema Dolma. “We urge the governments and UN bodies to use this practical tool to hold China accountable to its human rights commitments and keep China on track with implementing its human rights commitments, which are so greatly needed in Tibet”
1 View the Human Rights Action Plan for Tibet (HRAP-T) at www.HumanRightsTibet.org
2 Tibet Advocacy Coalition core members are Tibet Justice Center, Students for a Free Tibet and International Tibet Network. Together the Tibet Advocacy Coalition works to develop strategies, monitoring tools, and reports to highlight the situation in Tibet at the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Coalition also works together to offer support to other Tibet groups engaging in UN mechanisms and strengthen the global Tibet movement’s advocacy work and lead an on-the-ground team of Tibet advocates. See http://tibetnetwork.org/portfolio-items/tibet-advocacy-coalition/. Advisors to the Coalition include International Human Rights Program, Boston University School of Law and Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy
3 References to Tibet encompass the three original provinces of U-Tsang, Kham and Amdo, which are incorporated into the Chinese regions of the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and the Provinces of Sichuan, Qinghai, Gansu and Yunnan.
4 UPR: Universal Periodic Review of China took place in October 2013 and was finalised in March 2014. See http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Upr/Pages/CNSession17.aspx
CESCR: Committee for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Review of China took place in May 2014. See http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2fCHN%2fCO%2f2&Lang=en
5 More than 130 self-immolation protests by Tibetans living under Chinese rule have taken place since 2009; over 85 in 2012, with 28 in the month of November 2012 alone. More than 100 of these protesters are known to have died. The most recent self immolation protest took place in eastern Tibet on 17 September. See http://standupfortibet.org/learn-more/protesters/